A Culture of Healthy Familes
As is often said, the family is
the fundamental building block of society. Obviously, a whole is always made up
of smaller parts, so the family dynamics of small communities create the
culture of the society. Are all societies and cultures equally valid, and who
is to determine this? The mindset the world has on this issue comes usually
from a point of moral relativism. Interpreting society from this point of view
eliminates the existence of an absolute truth, or moral standard of comparison.
This means that no society can decide which other societies are either right
nor wrong because morality is subjective to each individual and their personal
experiences. Although this philosophy seems the most inclusive and supportive
of societal diversity, it has a few major flaws. Changing what is right and
wrong with each new whim of information that arrives would create a stressful
and confusing standard of ethics. This is why there is such a wide variety of
ideals in different societies in our world today. It is however, and thankfully,
morally acceptable to pick and choose the best possible practices from several
different cultures and combine them to fit correct ethical standards. We do
this just as groups of people have been doing it for millennia before. Just as
we copied the architecture and mathematics of the ancient Roman cultures, we’ve
copied the governmental strategies of the Greeks. Another way we can learn from
those ancient cultures is by learning from their mistakes, practices that
caused political disharmony or social chaos have been discontinued in our
modern world today, such as cannibalism, human sacrifice, or genocide. I would
challenge a moral relativist to declare that these societal habits are just as
ethically valid as any other.
Of course, these examples are all
extremes for the sake of demonstration, but there are more subtle instances of
ideals that have caused problems in even our modern society. Let’s take this issue
back to families, since we’ve already determined it is the fundamental building
block of society. What are some things that could potentially damage this system
of families? Two examples I can think of are cohabitation and same gender
marriage. Considerable research done on each of these relationships has shown
they provide significant damage both to the children and to the health of the relationship
itself. In fact, research has concluded that 33% of couples that entered into cohabitation
together before marriage were later divorced (Fox). Children from gay families
are almost five times as likely to have suicidal tendencies then children from
traditional families, and children raised by lesbian parents are more than three
times as likely to have been forced to participate in non-consensual sex (Regnerus).
These statistics sound incredulous, but they are accurate and significant for
the quality of US families today and should be perpetuated and shared for the
good of the rising generation. Traditional parents who waited to live together until
after marriage are the ideal family type, and this can be supported in our
society by removing the stigma around sharing the facts that show this is true.
Truly loving communities who sincerely desire the greater good for homes should not set aside science that perpetuates healthy families.
Fox, Lauren. “The Science
of Cohabitation: A Step Toward Marriage, Not a Rebellion.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media
Company, 20 Mar. 2014, www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/03/the-science-of-cohabitation-a-step-toward-marriage-not-a-rebellion/284512/.
Regnerus, Mark. “Children
Outcomes.” FamilyStructureStudies.com - NFSS - Outcomes for Children, NFSS, www.familystructurestudies.com/outcomes/.
Comments
Post a Comment